\n
![](\"https:\/\/en.hamsonews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/6050056.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
\n<\/p>\n
Kayhan addressed Israel\u2019s repeated attacks on Lebanon and Iran\u2019s support for the Resistance Front. According to the paper, the Israeli regime\u2019s strikes deep inside Lebanese territory and against Hezbollah forces were carried out in full coordination with Trump, so that the United States would gain a new pressure lever in its stalled negotiations with Iran.<\/p>\n
It appears that Trump and Netanyahu intend to use the tactic of \u201ctwo steps forward, one step back\u201d regarding violations of the ceasefire and claims of returning to it. Certainly, without Iran\u2019s power, Hezbollah\u2019s steadfastness, and Ansarullah\u2019s threats in the Bab al\u2011Mandeb region, the enemy would never have accepted a ceasefire and would have completely disregarded it. Iran\u2019s support for the oppressed resistance in Lebanon demonstrated that Iran stands firmly by its allies\u2014unlike the United States, which sacrificed the Persian Gulf states in the recent war and is now sacrificing the Lebanese state and its very existence. Iran\u2019s model of support, if embraced by neighboring countries, could be extended to the Persian Gulf and bring lasting security and sustainable development to the region.<\/p>\n
Iran: The strategic defeat of a superpower<\/strong><\/p>\n The Iran newspaper examined Trump\u2019s approach toward Iran, especially on nuclear issues. It wrote that the positions Trump has taken in recent years paved the way for the US withdrawal from the JCPOA and intensified regional tensions, yet the goals he defined for himself ultimately were not achieved. From a strategic perspective, the failure to achieve these goals can be considered a strategic defeat for a superpower\u2014one that affects America\u2019s international standing and the future of the global order. Given recent developments, a return to the JCPOA framework is practically impossible for Trump and his team, because such a return would mean accepting the two core pillars of the agreement: continued enrichment in Iran alongside the reduction or lifting of sanctions. From Trump\u2019s viewpoint, this would be an obvious defeat. The Iran file has become a matter of prestige and a defining element of his political legacy, and its outcome may become the main benchmark for judging the success or failure of his second term.<\/p>\n Siasat\u2011e-Rooz: Violators of international law possess nuclear weapons<\/strong><\/p>\n Nuclear weapons are currently in the hands of regimes that do not adhere to international law. The United States and the Israeli regime possess nuclear weapons and have repeatedly threatened to use them in a war against Iran, despite knowing the consequences. Israel, which has not even accepted the NPT, possesses nuclear weapons, though it denies it. But if it truly has no nuclear weapons, why does it refuse to join the NPT? John Mearsheimer, the American political scientist, recently stated: \u201cIf Israel loses the war, it may launch a nuclear attack on Iran!\u201d This statement has multiple implications: it highlights the danger of Israel using nuclear weapons, and it also reflects the possibility of Israel\u2019s defeat in a war with Iran. Meanwhile, Iran is a member of the IAEA, has signed and joined the NPT, and abides by it. Iran must adjust its nuclear policy to eliminate the threat of a nuclear strike from Israel.<\/p>\n Khorasan: Iran has a freer hand than the other side<\/strong><\/p>\n Khorasan described Lebanon as a strong and high\u2011pressure lever within the Resistance Front against Israel and the United States. In the current situation, with Iran\u2019s active role and Hezbollah\u2019s strategic success in imposing insecurity on the northern occupied territories, Lebanon has gradually become a card that strengthens the Resistance\u2019s ability to impose further equations on Israel. Iran\u2019s strongly worded reaction became a unified fist on the table of the US president, forcing him to restrain Israel. Iran\u2019s threat to end the process of message exchanges with the American side trapped Trump and revealed which side is more desperate to avoid war and reach an agreement. This will place the American side in an even weaker position in the coming days. Once again, events showed that Iran still has a freer hand than its counterpart to escalate tensions and impose its desired equation.<\/p>\n Etemad: Netanyahu\u2019s dark objective in attacking Lebanon<\/strong><\/p>\n Hassan Hanizadeh, an international affairs analyst, told Etemad that recent developments in southern Lebanon and the shift in the US government\u2019s approach to Israeli actions reveal deeper dimensions of Israel\u2019s retreat. Netanyahu\u2019s main goal in provoking recent tensions is to occupy parts of Beirut\u2019s outskirts and southern Lebanon, using them as bargaining chips in negotiations between Lebanon and Israel. Netanyahu sought to disrupt the regional political landscape and overshadow the Iran\u2013US dialogue, obstructing any potential agreement between Tehran and Washington. However, Iran\u2019s warning and threat became the turning point in these developments. Iran has proven that any political or strategic movement in the region must place the issue of southern Lebanon at the top of its priorities.
\n
\n \u00a0<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n